Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: Returning to vanilla ZSH during run-time?
- X-seq: zsh-users 12611
- From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Returning to vanilla ZSH during run-time?
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:22:14 +0100
- Cc: "zsh users" <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=migiIk+IgNvw3B3CGl6tpEyfw8hec7kdqzezK30ecTY=; b=DkhnZvBKk2rI4XCk5c+UGgIESKknCkOjR3Wrz1YVOkaDliOMtUD30PVgAJ8lij9Pmq7xEwgRryrU0pY8sel5GETWOoXlw6k5FOZ6aoVyVd4EAi1JnnJNqFyxRn8IdQJs2YsSZowfDh7bFYeM/WW9FwIaWA5HeRoqaNTHReXeP0Q=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ke4mjn7fHNzN2uZxrwoz/QLIKIqgsXJ0FdBDIrxVeegYCCj6/miMPSsXWG8qNBpaYPN7b3kFbXL6zNrZ7dr9PPweXmgPkTCdtBoRyseUtIPav/LdJqjLja8iFuejNc/dGXsKgwhwbNE7OiTQMtUqXtpNLRa0e2jdRDM7PgO2kog=
- In-reply-to: <080216232354.ZM18324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <2d460de70802160530k23cfaac2k4fa8915a57d66b46@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <237967ef0802160702u37446cffq9a910cdbd5d6d83b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70802160713y21f00880mda43b4915ddd8375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <237967ef0802160716i233e90b0tad66776cd95c0bc3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70802160727u3c073130t4de1e1d4747bcf89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080216081452.ZM30973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70802160826i1aea2860nb2578d64dbbb186e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080217000323.GO619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70802161820l3f7d5c22w10dcbf6ebec7b697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080216232354.ZM18324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Feb 17, 2008 8:23 AM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I still don't follow why (1a) isn't "zsh -i" and (3) "exit". Why do you
> need this all to happen in the same shell? What's the benefit?
I don't need to, I just would prefer to. When you told me it was not
do-able in the way I wanted to do it, I assumed you would know
what you were talking about and closed the subject. The rest was
me answering suggestions of others :)
> To see why the shell doesn't "just do this", have a look at the script
> Util/reporter in the zsh distribution, which has a go at being "run
> command to save current state", and notice that with all the possible
> different combinations of loadable modules and so on that even those
> 500-odd lines don't manage to cover everything, by a long shot.
Will do :)
Messages sorted by: