Re: zsh.texi commentary (actually, HTML pages commentary)

[Zefram <A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>} That patch isn't in the baseline yet.  It made the canonical form of
>} that option NOMATCH, so that "setopt NOMATCH", "unsetopt NOMATCH",
>} "setopt NO_NOMATCH" and "unsetopt NO_NOMATCH" are valid.
>
>So you check for canonical forms before stripping off the leading "no",
>and then check again after stripping it to invert the sense?  Or what?

Yes.  I considered having it check for leading "no" first, but with
options NOTIFY and NOMATCH that wouldn't work.

>} Also these are builins now, which is not yet documented.
>
>Exactly what difference does that make?  (Which is part of what ought to
>be documented ...)

That affects "disable exec"/"disable -r exec", and "x=ex; ${x}ec foo".

-zefram