Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Completion behavior change in 3.0-pre3

X-seq: zsh-workers 1676
From: Christoph von Stuckrad <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: schaefer@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Completion behavior change in 3.0-pre3
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 11:52:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <960715230041.ZM1638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Priority: normal
Reply-to: "C. v. Stuckrad" <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 15 Jul 1996, Bart Schaefer wrote:

> Subject: Completion behavior change in 3.0-pre3 
--pre2--example deleted--
> Here's zsh 3.0-pre3:
> 
> zagzig<3> echo z*i<TAB>
> (feep)
> zagzig<3> echo z\*i

Isn't this a feature instead of a bug ?

THIS 'z\*i' is exactly what would be used on the input line if the
pattern doesn't glob (is it?, well, HERE it is, but i've set the option
'nonomatch' to get this behaviour).

So if this behaviour depends on 'nonomatch' I would appreciate it!
If not, well, I think one can get used to it.

By the way, I fear almoust all scripts I use break due to
the new '((' and '[[' 'blanks', but I'll have to try yet
I'm just compiling...

Fanatic zsh-user Stucki

Christoph von Stuckrad       *  *  | talk to  | <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> \
Freie Universitaet Berlin    |/__* | nickname | ...!unido!fub!leibniz!stucki|
Fachbereich Mathematik, EDV  |\  * | 'stucki' | Tel:+49 30 838-7545{9|8}    |
Arnimallee 2-6/14195 Berlin  * *   |  on IRC  | Fax:+49 30 838-5913        /

References:
- Completion behavior change in 3.0-pre3
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author