Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released

X-seq: zsh-workers 1790
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: schaefer@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 17:55:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <960726213003.ZM20287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Bart Schaefer at "Jul 26, 96 09:30:03 pm"
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368

> Hmm ... you seem to be saying that
> 
> 	TRAPHUP() { echo Hangup }
> 	trap "echo Hang UP" 1
> 	
> causes an implicit "unfunction TRAPHUP".  What, then, happens if
> 
> 	trap "echo Hangup" 1
> 	TRAPHUP() { echo Hang UP }
> 
> ??  Does the TRAPHUP definition cause an implicit "trap - 1"?

Yes or course.  That's quite similar to the old behaviour.

Zoltan

References:
- Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author