Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release

X-seq: zsh-workers 2267
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
Date: 19 Oct 1996 16:41:01 +0200
In-reply-to: Richard Coleman's message of Sat, 19 Oct 1996 00:07:39 -0400
References: <199610190407.AAA29956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: hniksic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Richard Coleman (coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> rest of the code to be under GPL (which I'm generally against).  I like

What is the reason of this?  I cannot find anything so bad in the GPL
-- it actually seems to be quite similar to the current zsh license.

There was quite a lot of talk on XEmacs mailing list about Stallman
and his (alleged) paranoia, but it was mostly connected with assigning
the copyright to the FSF.  What is wrong with the GPL itself?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xxxxxxx> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Good pings come in small packets.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
  - From: Richard Coleman

References:
- Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
  - From: Richard Coleman

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author