Re: Bugreport zsh 3.1.2: Shell exits prematurely after aborting history-incremental-search-backward

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>]

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> I still
> think there's an EOF being incorrectly propagated when the bck-i-search:
> prompt is interrupted with C-c, but perhaps that doesn't matter if this
> masks it.

I think even that's OK.  There were two distinct EOF's involved.  The
one I found from debugging was from a previous source:  it really did
reach EOF, so that was the correct behaviour.  The bug was this was 
being remembered, and later on a chain of events (flushing data when
there wasn't any causing a lexstop with no yylex active) caused
*another* EOF to be returned, this time incorrectly, from zleread().
The bug was the chain of events in between, not the EOF's.  (Or am I
missing the point?)

> Side note:  What's the point of leaving out the 'a' in "bck"?  Just to
> make it the same number of characters as "fwd"?

I suppose Paul had an aversion to typing.  Probably understandable
under the circumstances.  He was a vi user :-).

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>       Tel: +39 50 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Gruppo Teorico, Dipartimento di Fisica
Piazza Torricelli 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy