PATCH: 3.1.6-test-1: Don't use strcoll() with ranges

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart's pointed out to me that there was some discussion about problems with
using strcoll() inside character ranges:  for one thing, [A-Z] in the de
locale matches all characters, which is not good.  So this just uses ASCII
collation in this one case.  You can also use [[:upper:]], of course; that
seems to be safer without this patch.

--- Src/glob.c.strcoll	Thu Jun 24 18:04:31 1999
+++ Src/glob.c	Sun Jul 18 17:37:35 1999
@@ -2926,7 +2926,10 @@
      * and optional ^ have already been skipped.          */
 
     char *pat = *patptr;
-#ifdef HAVE_STRCOLL
+    /* We don't use strcoll() for ranges, since it can have side
+     * effects.  It's less necessary now we have [:posix:] ranges.
+     */
+#if 0
     char l_buf[2], r_buf[2], ch_buf[2];
 
     ch_buf[0] = ch;
@@ -2944,7 +2947,7 @@
 		break;
 	} else if (*pat == '-' && pat[-1] != rchar &&
 		   pat[1] != Outbrack) {
-#ifdef HAVE_STRCOLL
+#if 0
 	    l_buf[0] = PPAT(-1);
 	    r_buf[0] = PAT(1);
 	    if (strcoll(l_buf, ch_buf) <= 0 &&

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy