Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath

X-seq: zsh-workers 8142
From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:35:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <19991006182459.A9694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <19990927141724.B10336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <37FB7732.77D9B5EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991006182459.A9694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>

Adam Spiers, on thelonious (adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Was I wrong in thinking that this was a typo?  Or did you just
> accidentally unfix my fix? :-)

Agh, ignore that; I read the patch the wrong way round.  Like I said ...

> P.S. Am I alone in finding context diffs remarkably awkward to read?

But it still looks this patch replaces two or more of the previous
_man patches.  Which ones?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

References:
- PATCH: _man copes with : delimited manpath
  - From: Adam Spiers
- PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath
  - From: Adam Spiers

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author