Re: Completion for mutt

[Ollivier Robert <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

According to Sven Wischnowsky:
> If you want to say that exactly that compctl doesn't work for you --
> it does for me (well, something similar, I don't have a Debian system
> here).

It is a FreeBSD system but no matter.
 
> If you want to say that it doesn't complete the right thing after
> loading the new completion system -- right, there doesn't seem to be a 
> completion function for these commands.

I thought the new completion was compatible with the old one (i.e. having
compctl would still work).
 
> If you want to say that after loading the new completion system the
> compctl doesn't seem to be used -- right, see the function _default
> in the Base subdirectory of the distribution. You can un-comment a
> call to `compcall' there to make compctl's be used when there is no
> completion function for a certain command.

I have uncommented this line but the old mutt completion rule still doesn't
work.

Now, I just found that what I used to make completion case-independent (see
below) doesn't work anymore. With dev-16 it was still working.

compctl -M 'm:{a-z}={A-Z} m:{A-Z}={a-z}'

Now, I can't complete independantly of the case :-(
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/TEC -=- roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Postman hits! The Postman hits! You have new mail.