Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

zle -U

X-seq: zsh-workers 10140
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: zle -U
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:24:08 +0000
In-reply-to: <1000311075721.ZM19210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <200003091221.NAA25853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1000311075721.ZM19210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mar 11,  7:57am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
}
} 	zle -U frob
} 
} This results in "brof" being inserted onto the command line.

Sven sent a patch to fix that, but there's still a problem with this:

	zle -U f
	zle -U r
	zle -U o
	zle -U b

Once again we get "brof".  Maybe we should just admit that there is no
input "queue" (only a stack), as is done with "print -z"?

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

References:
- Re: The `zle' command and traps
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky
- Re: The `zle' command and traps
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author