Re: PATCH: Re: expansion

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Stephenson wrote:

> Bart wrote:
> > Sven wrote:
> > } They should be turned into boolean styles and the condition should come
> > } from somewhere else, e.g. the -e option to zstyle I suggested (see
> > } 11691).
> > 
> > I agree.
> 
> Yes, that would be preferable.  Does `evaluated' mean `treated as a string
> to be passed directly to eval' or `split into words and executed' or
> `parsed and executed as a command line'? 

The last, which is what eval does, isn't it? At least it does the same
as bin_eval().

> I think it could be clearer.
> `$reply' would be more standard, but it doesn't really mean much here;

Ok.

> I wish there were something more obvious, but I bet we've discussed that.

Not much discussion. And yes, it would be nice if... but it was the
cleanest I could think of. Before that I suggested `special values'
which is even uglier.

If anyone has any ideas...

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx