Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50

X-seq: zsh-workers 14612
From: Oliver Kiddle <opk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:53:52 +0100
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20010530144809.E47866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <010530150208.ZM3863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010530184016.B3618@xxxxxxxx> <010530170846.ZM4077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010531094055.A12930@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: kiddleo

Clint Adams wrote:

> It "renames" them to m4_define and m4_undefine.  I don't know why.
> Akim, can you enlighten us?

Is it using the --prefix-builtins (-P) option to m4 for this then? If
so, that sounds quite sensible because it can be quite annoying in m4
having to remember to quote any builtins. Anyway, that sounds like it
will be a fairly trivial fix to configure.in when we come to switch to
autoconf 2.5.

> We might want to send configure.in to the Attic and name it configure.ac
> after 4.0 gets branched off.

Why out of interest? What would autoconf 2.5 have it replaced by then?

Oliver

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Clint Adams

References:
- zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Jos Backus
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Clint Adams

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author