Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: AIX patch

X-seq: zsh-workers 15003
From: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AIX patch
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:56:12 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ZSH Workers Mailing List <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1010620171243.ZM8591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Bart Schaefer wrote:

>
> That raises the question of what SOCKLEN_T gets defined to be when NONE
> of the types that are attempted work.  (It also raises the question of
> whether we should be testing for HAVE_SOCKLEN_T and providing our own
> typedef if not, rather than defining a SOCKLEN_T macro.)  I think the
> right way to default to `int' is to fall back on it when the test fails
> entirely.
>

It does default to int currently. As for typedef - how are other types
handled currently (e.g. 64-bit integer)?

-andrej

References:
- Re: AIX patch
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author