Re: KSH_TYPESET and 4.0.2

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> Can we get a few more votes on whether KSH_TYPESET should go in 4.0.2?
> 
> I note that we still haven't resolved the bash-compatibility issue.  Other
> than that, though, I see no reason not to include it.

It's not exactly a bug fix, but after fixing the setting of individual
positional params it doesn't seem to be problematic.  If it looks like
people are running across this difference I don't mind it going in.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************