Re: disowning stopped jobs

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 25, 11:00am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: disowning stopped jobs
}
} Maybe we can `solve' (or, rather, circumvent) this problem by being more
} verbose, saying `warning: job is stopped, use `kill -CONT ...' to resume'.
} That way, users can even use cut&paste to make the job running.
} 
} Any better wording?  Should we print the `kill ...' indented on its own
} line?

I think it's OK as it is, at least until we get some empirical feedback.

What about my other suggestion, that `%job &!' should use `bg' and then
handle the job table in exec.c ?

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net