Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: why is 2 the smallest HISTSIZE?

X-seq: zsh-workers 16612
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Derek Peschel <dpeschel@xxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: why is 2 the smallest HISTSIZE?
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:53:00 +0000
In-reply-to: <20020212045901.A10430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20020212045901.A10430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 12,  4:59am, Derek Peschel wrote:
}
} Did the implementation (of the "last command" buffer) change, but the
} 2 not get changed to 1?

I think that's what happened, but only Wayne Davison can say for certain.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net

References:
- why is 2 the smallest HISTSIZE?
  - From: Derek Peschel

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author