Re: PATCH: xmllint completion

[Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19 Feb, you wrote:

> > Thanks, I've added this. We should perhaps clump it together with
> > _xsltproc in an _xmlsoft (any views?). An xmlcatalog completion if/when
> > written could go in there too.
> 
> This sounds like a good idea to me.

Okay, I'll do that then.

> Maybe _webbrowser should be made a 'Type' and named something a little
> more general?

Perhaps. I'd probably have left it as _urls -f but you need separate
functions for nested tag loops to work so it seemed the easiest
solution. Trouble is that _webbrowser is for the most part just used
for a bunch of web browsers, renaming might break someone's own function
and I can't think of a better name (anyone?).

Oliver


This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only.  It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege.  It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party.  If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender.  Thank you.