Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: printf bug(s?)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 21357
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: printf bug(s?)
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:47:18 +0000
- In-reply-to: <fb6be96e05061706483b30e32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <42B2203B.3060602@xxxxxxxxxx> <8037.1118996107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42B2CE98.8070905@xxxxxxxxxx> <fb6be96e05061706483b30e32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jun 17, 3:48pm, J wrote:
} Subject: Re: printf bug(s?)
}
} > I may be better off avoiding using \045 anyway and just
} > replace it with %%...
}
} If I run
} $ printf '\045i' '5+1'
} I would certainly expect it to print 6, and not %i.
Is the printf builtin (or shell utility) specified by POSIX? If so,
this may be a reasonable question for austin-group interpretation.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author