Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Getting the CVS revision of Zsh

X-seq: zsh-workers 26311
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Getting the CVS revision of Zsh
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:36:59 +0000
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200901141722.n0EHMZwf002944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <2d460de70901090301h6b309a7cm19c5ebfec989ff2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70901140533icf13f94yc7f63f974b236f45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <090114085737.ZM18662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200901141722.n0EHMZwf002944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:22:35PM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> If someone is really bundling individual patches with zsh, so that it is
> different from any CVS checkout, then I would urge them to alter
> $ZSH_PATCHLEVEL to avoid exactly the sort of confusion you describe.  I
> can add a config option to fix a patchlevel if this is useful.

Yes, we do this.  I can just patch zsh.mdd to work around it though.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Getting the CVS revision of Zsh
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- Re: Getting the CVS revision of Zsh
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author