Re: Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 25,  6:20pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} But yes, I share your feeling that this isn't a particularly vital
} addition, it just looked easy to do like other shells in compatability
} mode, which is the point of that.

It just seems to me that we're potentially penalizing a script that does
not use aliases in the can't-open-tempfile case in order to support a
script that does not use aliases.

Given potential security problems with using tempfiles and the likelyhood
of a script using an alias vs. the likelyhood of file creation failing,
which case ought we be catering too?