Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: `Recent Directories' not included in the man pages?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 28280
- From: ÅtÄpÃn NÄmec <stepnem@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: `Recent Directories' not included in the man pages?
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:04:28 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y5HDBwvnfNXsCdculu8sCz2sS5Uhu+9KVt0YEirgqfE=; b=YkX+ovY/JFDWTV+UA8z9oZQZ7/NlyCm6R5Ez3ZDTBJ/ma+pBs6pr14IYv8AfUFqS98 rhsjc2LC41Dio8AUBV3K2514cy6h+0vQtKlmqS/1PGavq6VBu8auTY7dGdKJiUKgwvVt uqQNv4BbcKk6Dku9/AylmsargNSKOrLUuS9RM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V4Bv2SEZ9JaMgwWLacm3VCRpLec29fzIDaQLDB3JqFtNOpY8OXXN8WgLhVM23LJpcN 3CI2cu/lm80m0v2LkA/d6jb9hmuO8fDeFvpynDUeV19uLmIVWy1sYpkmQ9oIHdjFNYCy BsohcAo7f4BwqRxNRxLmQtwN+ZeP21L7p0rcM=
- In-reply-to: <100919120209.ZM25479@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Bart Schaefer's message of "Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:02:09 -0700")
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <8739t5tzxg.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <100919120209.ZM25479@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sep 19, 7:18pm, ( Text in unknown character set UTF-8 not shown ) wrote:
> } today I recompiled my Zsh after some time and wanted to read the docs
> } about the new cdr function etc., but it seems like the whole section is
> } only included in zsh.texi, but not in the man pages...
> "make all" at the top level should recurse into the Doc subdirectory and
> build the manual pages. Depending on your $MANPATH, you might also need
> to "make install.man" to have the pages become visible.
Indeed, `make install.man' did it... thanks! Still, it's strange -- I
would expect `make' and `make install' to do the right thing, which they
obviously didn't for me (although I checked the man pages after `make'
and `make install' and their modification time indicated that they were
newly generated, neither those in the respository nor those installed in
my man directories contained the new section. Only `make install.man'
seems to have actually regenerated the manual pages).
Thank you and sorry for the noise
Messages sorted by: