Re: "bad substitution" error for ${a[b]}

[Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:47:02 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 16,  9:30am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } [...] we could do with taking some of the parameter substitution test
> } cases and feeding them through NO_EXEC.
> 
> Any suggestions which ones?  The only thing that should have changed
> with 35799 is subscript handling.
> 
> The following caes all work, but of course "work" means "do nothing at
> all" -- so I guess the point is just to assert that there are no errors?

Yes, just a random selection including subscripts to have a bit of
confidence it's roughly in order.  That looks reasonable.

Thanks
pws