Re: [PATCH] handle options of _arguments correctly

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sep 30,  1:12am, Jun T. wrote:
} Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle options of _arguments correctly
} 
} 2015/09/29 08:48, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
} 
} > I don't see anything immediate (though this renders the name "singsub"
} > for the array somewhat nonsensical).
} 
} Do you mean 'singopt'? I guess it means 'single-letter option'.

Yes (subst.c on the brain), and yes, which seems specifically to mean
the "-s" switch ... but not very important.

} I think we need explicitly pass ':' to comparguments.

I was actually going to suggest that, and then stopped short because I
wasn't convinced it was necessary.  I think it's a good idea.