Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Re: zsh-workers/37266 has a malicious attachment
- X-seq: zsh-workers 37274
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh-workers/37266 has a malicious attachment
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:35:18 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=I2DDGMaBGsP8hz+2vnb+9meNewo=; b=y11/si QS2ygemRPKOUZ9vt/SJuzqEocMZfQpHudCeTY6CepRbFrty6kyta3Qwpw3avtSjX 8BfQbdMUA8QppM+Agocww0uFD39XgxyvW3rrmCCSsaVJEQeAwFa3Ynj2r4+CN4U8 2Y5urjUm38JMBDmG0I2PIaLH5JzJNaszLRvIU=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=I2DDGMaBGsP8hz+2vnb+9meNewo=; b=q9VNK kYzZ/l2lkl7DwVTmfqyxHPUbpboYILr2w2t8jomX/3u1ywTLs6xXNwrvh7k1N3mY R9KERdXOYwjVpEeKKhD2xR/HLlSMDH9NTjHDQ5jMB7X6NgHAOjlok1TAESeAIDk5 VlDg/8Q1OOKBMn463gIPRB2Hl1aPmHs3BZn5+w=
- In-reply-to: <20151202002119.GI6644@sym.noone.org>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <151201101131.ZM32158@torch.brasslantern.com> <email@example.com> <20151202002119.GI6644@sym.noone.org>
Axel Beckert wrote on Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:21:20 +0100:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:33:19PM +0300, ZyX wrote:
> > 01.12.2015, 21:12, "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Dec 1, 12:24pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > > Or maybe non-member posts could require approval, as with
> > > -announce.
> That's much better.
Apache lists permit posts by non-subscribers but require the first post
by a non-subscribed address to be manually approved. (Subsequent posts
do not require approval.) I think I only ever saw one false negative
there. The only effect to posters is a delay the first time they post.
They implement that policy through 'ezmlm-make -+ -m -u'.
> > vim* lists uses google groups and moderation for new members and I
> > almost never see spam there.
> Nevertheless using Google Groups as a mailing list has tons of other
> issues. IMHO it's by far not worth to drop a proper and working ML for
> crappy Google Groups. And you don't know how long they will exist.
> Just think about Google Wave, Google Reader and all the other nice
> services they already closed down.
> Besides the nice X-Seq feature is surely not available on Google
Messages sorted by: