Re: [PATCH] _virsh (Was: Re: zsh virsh completion)

[Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Marko Myllynen wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:36:36 +0300:
> On 2016-07-20 09:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Marko Myllynen wrote on Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 15:06:52 +0300:
> >> +        _cache_virsh_cmds[$_cache_virsh_cmds[(i)$icmd]]=()
> >> +      done
> >>      fi
> >>      if (( ! $+_cache_virsh_cmdopts )); then
> >>        typeset -gA _cache_virsh_cmdopts
> >>      fi
> >>      _arguments -A "-*" -C -S -s -w \
> > 
> > Oliver remarked on the -w earlier, are you quite sure it's correct?
> > 
> >               -w     In combination with -s, allow option stacking even if one
> >                      or more of the options take arguments.  For example, if
> >                      -x takes an argument, with no -s, `-xy' is considered as
> >                      a single (unhandled) option; with -s, -xy is an option
> >                      with the argument `y'; with both -s and -w, -xy may be
> >                      the option -x and the option -y with arguments still to
> >                      come.
> > 
> > (-s and -w are options to _arguments, -xy is a word on the command line
> > being completed)
> 
> I mentioned that virsh accepts all the following: -r -d 0, -r -d0, -rd
> 0, or -rd0. So to me it would seem that -s -w is correct here, right?

All these require only -s [without -w].

Does virsh accept «-dr 0» where the 0 is argument to -d [regardless of
whether -r takes an argument]?  _That_'s what -w is about.

Could you suggest how to clarify the man page section I quoted?

Cheers,

Daniel