Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: spelling correction buffer overflow

X-seq: zsh-workers 42551
From: Kamil Dudka <kdudka@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: spelling correction buffer overflow
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:01:43 +0200
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7azsotksHqJd4LJn4NJ=69oH7QPTg=EKDsjbQaHZM00oQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <3579.1522103995@thecus> <52497193.Jvz9bWjiNL@kdudka-nb> <CAH+w=7azsotksHqJd4LJn4NJ=69oH7QPTg=EKDsjbQaHZM00oQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, March 28, 2018 1:10:41 AM CEST Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Kamil Dudka <kdudka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 12:39:55 AM CEST Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> >> In utils.c:spname(), there's no checking on newname[] for overflows in
> >> two out the of three places where it is appended to.
> > 
> > Thanks!  After applying this patch, zsh does not crash any more while
> > trying to correct an overly long command.
> 
> I have not seen this patch on the -workers list, yet.

I meant this patch (workers/42539):

http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2018/msg00345.html

Kamil

References:
- PATCH: spelling correction buffer overflow
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: PATCH: spelling correction buffer overflow
  - From: Kamil Dudka
- Re: PATCH: spelling correction buffer overflow
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author