Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: 'mutt -f' completion & _mailboxes

X-seq: zsh-users 8228
From: Francisco Borges <borges@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh User <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 'mutt -f' completion & _mailboxes
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:55:47 +0100
In-reply-to: <20041117141609.GA16412@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Zsh User <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: Alfa Informatica - Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
References: <20041117141609.GA16412@xxxxxxxxxx>

Me again...

» On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:16:09PM +0100, Francisco Dellatorre Borges wrote:

> 1. Is there any reason why _mutt shouldn't also complete
> 
> % mutt -f[TAB]
> 
> with '=' (appart from \! \> \<?), e.g.:

I guess the problem is that _mailboxes expects mutt to have 
"mutt -f=" or "mutt -f+" as context and _mutt does not allow that so,
_mailboxes never receives the context it expects.

Well, at least whenever you have corrections turned on.

[...]

IMHO, one thing that could be used to improve _mailboxes would be to use

`mutt -Q folder | cut -d= -f2` to set a mutt-directory variable inside
at least _mailbox_cache.

If you are wondering: Why am I not sending patches instead of comments?
Because _mailbox_cache and _mua_mailbox seem awfully complicaded to me. 

that was it for today... peace.
Francisco

References:
- 'mutt -f' completion
  - From: Francisco Borges

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author