I have ttyctl -f, not because I'm terribly clever, but because it came
from a sample somewhere in a zsh distribution.
I do see that stty may not be the best solution in some cases, e.g.,
remote logins may need ^?, while local logins may need ^h, or v.v. To
me it is better to detect the source and use stty. The function
solution to me is a bit too brittle. You can make a reasonable
argument for either solution.
Peter Stephenson wrote:
Bart Schaefer wrote:
That's a pretty cute trick, Peter. I think it still runs into problems
with "ttyctl -f", though?
Yes, you'd need to unfreeze it before the stty to be sure. I suspect
most users haven't got the tty frozen.
pws
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
!DSPAM:41f0a0ef160441761677783!
|