Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Brace expansion performance
- X-seq: zsh-users 14957
- From: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Radoulov, Dimitre" <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Brace expansion performance
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:03:15 +0100
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=5evuiNgF22+XOlM/CfqPRLUthPHB2wcWH7+3Jwkw3h8=; b=MNwToFY9Za6yvXKQ4RayYq13zCMYm0ty/Xdi2av6+s2Ey6fF7PhxmpKVQj7Ia5rrNN vMX5GJ9zWm3vhAZhGyiy2aMwbPwHSdtmg6O/Ms15O/nwaWa6vdNx042c5GJHUVUKlvTM 5b8i91NYJllSs7iUZDfkdhswyztOI+SXzXHUI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=M4/JTzlpxy7R38/yMyQ80Z/Nxmrokg0o9S98jayNUOoVi4PkJ3BcFYkLo8LCWBV276 4IVEiw/TgkVa7Ao/Ct+ckoRTEuCtjkHLFMoJY7JsP3CFczJN38xgdWEJITHNSmgOLhGu m++ns1iZfcGCdy69D8vbVSQWTlITZsruipmJI=
- In-reply-to: <4BA799B0.2010902@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <4BA799B0.2010902@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: nikolai.weibull@xxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 17:24, Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> does anybody know why the zsh brace expansion (?) performs so ...
> differently?
Ouch.
Zsh is faster for
for (( i = 1; i <= 300000; i++ )); do :; done,
though.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author