--- Begin Message ---
- From: Russell Hoover <rj@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: can full hostname (instead of IP addr) be reported via 'watch'?
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:39:39 -0400
- In-reply-to: <140312181536.ZM13369@torch.brasslantern.com>
- References: <20140312232637.GA12697@panix.com> <140312181536.ZM13369@torch.brasslantern.com>
On Wed 12 at 06:15 PM -0700, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would imagine that on some big shell-server hosts like Panix they avoid > it to keep the network overhead down and the login process faster. Would that be the case even when (on panix) the command w -w delivers this kind of thing? (note hostnames): USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT jsm pts/47 65-101-91-109.dvnp.qwest.net Mon06PM 0 -bash wockner pts/25 ip68-107-97-160.sd.sd.cox.net 1:49PM 0 pine kd pts/74 bb-205-209-79-211.gwi.net Mon09AM 0 mutt.new kd pts/66 bb-205-209-79-211.gwi.net Mon09AM 0 mutt.new ime pts/75 65-129-90-176.bois.qwest.net 10:27AM 0 trn4 -p+ -Ax9lms wb8foz pts/7 pool-173-73-122-224.washdc.east.verizon.net Mon02AM 1 nn jankplus pts/64 inferno.aoml.noaa.gov:S.0 03Jan14 2 trn ababcock pts/5 167-4.nyc.dsl.access.net:S.3 29Sep13 2 /bin/sh ./otw ababcock pts/52 167-4.nyc.dsl.access.net Sat08PM 2 /usr/local/bin/screen-4.0.3 jwileman pts/26 107.18.132.231 6:31PM 2 alpine oleg pts/33 162-229-147-121.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal 21Aug13 3 trn4.new -q zconcept pts/71 64-201-241-82.static.paxio.net:S.0 9:10PM [ ... ] etc.
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
pgpRdb9q2DJe6.pgp
Description: PGP signature