Re: whence output varies with dot vs. realpath in $PATH

[Ray Andrews <rayandrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2022-10-31 17:31, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> No.  -m means to find all the names (in any hash table) that match a
> pattern.  -a means to show all the occurrences in $path of each name
> (either literally without -m, or found in the command hash table by
> -m).  -m happens first, and then -a searches the path.
That's a better explanation right there than in the docs.  I was only 
saying how I think it should work, how it *does* work is only now made 
clear.
> Whether a full path appears there depends on how the function was
> defined.  The only way you get the output with "... from ..." but
> without the full path is if you source the function from a file in the
> current directory (e.g., "source rap").

Ah!  so the full path information isn't even retained anywhere. Once 
it's in memory it doesn't matter.  But if I do this:

2 /aWorking/Zsh/Source/Wk 5 $ . $(realpath ./rap)

... whence shows me this:

rap is a shell function from /aWorking/Zsh/Source/Wk/rap

... because the full path is actually available at the time of 
sourcing.  There is always a way.