Re: coloring a substitution

[Ray Andrews <rayandrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2022-11-11 14:39, Roman Perepelitsa wrote:
> These four cases are {case-sensitive, case-insensitive} x {full,
> partial}. Moreover, the implementation of every case differs only on
> these two bits: case insensitivity is always encoded as (#i) and
> partial match always as *..*.
It is better.  More consistent.  I have no idea if the internal 
machinery is different but anyway the performance is identical.
> The only bizarre thing here is the names of these cases.

Don't worry about my naming, that's all just fooling around, but every 
one of my functions has these same four cases and I'm trying to work up 
a universal way of talking about it that compact since sometimes I have 
longish messages and making them as compact as possible is a good idea.  
I'll keep fooling around with it.


> Can you similarly describe these four cases, the way I've done in the
> first paragraph above? I cannot. All four look uniquely different, so
> the inventive names (BROAD, TAME, WILD, EXACT) almost look justified.

Right now I'm leaning to ?? FULL PARTIAL and EXACT.  But what's better 
than BROAD?  I don't like it, need something better.  Tho I do like 
WILD, because it's intuitively suggestive of wildcards. Not that it 
really matters, as I said this is entirely for my own use.

Thanks for the help, I learned a great deal.