Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Rationalized? aliases

X-seq: zsh-workers 575
From: Vinnie Shelton <shelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Richard Coleman <coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rationalized? aliases
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 18:38:01 -0500
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: coleman's message of Wed, 08 Nov 1995 18:17:19 -0500. <199511082317.SAA29367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: acs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

In message <199511082317.SAA29367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Coleman w
rote:
>
>Rather than changing the code of zsh for this, maybe you should
>just use
>
>alias e="$(whence e | tr -d \') -h"
>
>Doing things like this is what makes command substitution so
>cool.

Yes, but then I have to know to do the tr substition.
I want a general solution that works for commands and aliases
and is a little bit cleaner than piping the output through 'tr'
(IMHO).

--vin

References:
- Re: Rationalized? aliases
  - From: Richard Coleman

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author