Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion

X-seq: zsh-workers 8814
From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:41:21 +0000
In-reply-to: <199911300903.KAA19848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <199911300903.KAA19848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>

Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Well... they may have read your mail already. (I got a mail from Chet
> Ramey where he answered my `Are we being monitored?' with `Of course. 
> Great programmers steal good ideas wherever possible.')

<grin> But great programmers never re-invent the wheel.  What are the
remaining valid reasons why people would prefer bash over zsh?  (I
don't count inertia as valid :-)

Hmm, maybe this should be moved to zsh-users.  Or alt.religion.sh ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
  - From: Clint Adams

References:
- Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author