Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: bug in vared with command history

X-seq: zsh-workers 9673
From: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Greg Klanderman)
To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bug in vared with command history
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:49:35 -0500 (EST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh list)
In-reply-to: <1000210075838.ZM1677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <14496.51208.319493.828639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1000209041116.ZM288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14498.3514.295845.822718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1000210075838.ZM1677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>>>>> "Bart" == Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The whole 3.1.x series is considered to be an unstable beta

Ha!!  I started using zsh about a year ago (3.1.4) and I have to say
it has been the most reliable free software I've ever used... let
alone for a BETA.  By comparison, when I decided to switch to a Bourne 
style shell from tcsh, I first went to BASH (2.02) which is supposed
to be a stable release.  Within about 2 days I'd found at least ten
ways to crash it hard, was disgusted, and switched to zsh at the
recommendation of a few xemacs-beta list members.  It's the only
worthy shell in MHO.

Keep up the excellent work!

Greg

References:
- bug in vared with command history
  - From: Greg Klanderman
- Re: bug in vared with command history
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author