Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Test (re)numbering

X-seq: zsh-workers 11344
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:08:52 +0100
In-reply-to: "Your message of Fri, 12 May 2000 09:16:59 -0000." <1000512091659.ZM5110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Bart wrote
> Yes, and we probably should for 4.0 when we also massivly rename in the
> Completion subdirectories.  I was aiming for minimal renaming for 3.1.7.

Renaming twice strikes me as extra horrible from the CVS point of view.
I would say either rename to the final thing or not at all.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test (re)numbering
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- Re: Test (re)numbering
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author