Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier



On Feb 14,  6:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > I'd hate to beat a dead horse, but it's not clear to me 
> > whether 13280 has been rejected or just forgotten.
> 
> That's because it's not clear to anyone. I don't have any objections,
> does anyone know if they are relying on the old (somewhat unexpected)
> behaviour?

I don't believe I'm relying on the old behavior; I have a certain sort
of nostalgia for it because that's how the original csh behaves, but I
suppose we're long beyond worrying about compatibility with *that*.



Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author