Re: PATCH: Re: disowning stopped jobs

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I wrote:

> ...
> 
> I looked into this shortly, it would require us to export getjob() and
> then should be relatively simple.  But.  Just had an idea.  Why not give
> an option to disown, say `-c' for `continue', that makes it wake up
> stopped jobs before disowning them?  With that, users could alias
> `disown' to `disown -c' to never have to worry about that anymore and in
> execcmd() we just would have to stick the `-c' into the list.

Err... of course users could already write their own little functions
that call bg, then disown to get that.  But it still seems useful to
make this as convenient as possible -- maybe a setopt option (didn't
someone suggest this lately?).


Bye
  Sven


-- 
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx