Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15179
- From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
- To: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 09:51:54 -0400
- Cc: Tomi.Vainio@xxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <000601c0ffb5$999f20c0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:34:59PM +0400
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <15162.62750.136548.435614@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000601c0ffb5$999f20c0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> So, what others think? Should we change it to -KPIC for Solaris?
Except for gcc of course.
> No. Next thing is - why should zsh default to LP64 (that is what you mean.
> Zsh already supports 64-bit atithmetic and large files)? Does it fix
> something or adds new features?
It shouldn't; it should default to the default.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author