Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: new SourceForge terms



another piece of mail that was supposed to go the list but didnt...

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Ok.  I'm not going to push this, obviously.  I will point out that we
> are supporting 440 people currently.  I didn't think that zsh had that
> many developers where something like this would be a big issue.  If
> it does have a huge number of developers then maybe sources.redhat.com
> isn't a good place for it.

There are currently only 14 people with write access to the repository,
so I don't think we would cause much disruption.  It looks a sensible
place to move to, but I don't think there's any overriding reason to
move as yet.

Now talking of sources.redhat.com, if I could work out why Norton
Antivirus just quarantined my cygwin1.dll, I'd be a lot happier...

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************



Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author