Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Inconsistent signal handling?

X-seq: zsh-workers 17930
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
To: Philippe Troin <phil@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent signal handling?
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:57:51 +0000
Cc: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <87n0ojpmsm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <1733.1036752289@xxxxxxx> <87n0ojpmsm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Philippe Troin wrote:
>3. zsh no longer ignores SIGTERM).

Ignoring SIGTERM by default in interactive shells is long-established
consistent behaviour of all Bourne- and C-shell derivatives.  This should
be retained.  (It means that an errant kill(1), particularly a "kill 0",
is unlikely to accidentally terminate the shell.)

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inconsistent signal handling?
  - From: Philippe Troin

References:
- Re: Inconsistent signal handling?
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: Inconsistent signal handling?
  - From: Philippe Troin

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author