Re: PATCH: maxfilelocks in ulimit output

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Zefram wrote:
> Borzenkov Andrey wrote:
> >Untested idea (not having the relevant system and time :(
> 
> It's better not to rely on being able to run programs at configure time,
> to allow for cross compilation.

Yes, except we already screwed that up long ago; the configure file is
full of tests of that kind and adding one more isn't going to make a
difference.  (I'm doubtful whether it could be got to work without a
whole pile of extra run-time tests, and extremely doubtful that it's
worth the effort trying.)  Andrej's solution will be good enough when it
works.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************