Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Status of 4.1.x branch?

X-seq: zsh-workers 19239
From: Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx>
To: Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of 4.1.x branch?
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:38:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <20031111213010.GB28125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20031111213010.GB28125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

* Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxx> [Nov 11. 2003 22:30]:
> What's the status on a follow-on to 4.1.1?  I'm thinking of pushing for
> 4.1.1 to be integrated into Solaris (to replace 3.0.6 or whatever's
> there currently), because it seems stable enough to be a win over 4.0.x,
> but if there's going to be a new release soon, then I'd like to sit on
> it until then.  (If there's a concern that 4.1.x isn't stable enough yet
> for such a release, then I can push for 4.0.7 instead.)

Good point.

I've included 4.1.1 in SuSE Linux 9.0 and I saw not a single bug report
up until now ( +1 month ).

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.

References:
- Status of 4.1.x branch?
  - From: Danek Duvall

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author