Anyone have any preferences yay-nay about PGP-signing submitted patches?
Key is in strong-set, so there's a fair/middling chance a recipient
could verify such a signature.
For builtin/module commands, is there a real facility for being able to
get at the virtual stdin provided which supports heredoc/herestring/etc?
My messing around with a zsh/ruby uses a zrb command. I thought that
it'd be convenient if, when there are no parameters, zrb would use the
stdin as visible to the user, hence:
% zrb <<EORUBY
foo = { "fred" => 23, "barney" => 110 }
foo["fred"]
EORUBY
% print $zrb_type ${(t)zrb_value} $zrb_value
FIXNUM integer 23
That works at present if the ruby commands are provided as parameters
to zrb, and handles arrays of strings; I haven't yet decided on the best
way to deal in zsh with arrays of types other than strings or what to do
to represent a cut at the point where container types are nested.
Perhaps just always stringify ...
Disclaimer: I've only modified a couple of ruby scripts before in my
life; I only picked it because it has a coherent API (unlike Perl) and
the syntax isn't whitespace-dependent, which would be "interesting" to
mix into a shell.
Attachment:
pgpE5OXyMcXH1.pgp
Description: PGP signature