Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions

X-seq: zsh-workers 23619
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:59:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <20070628180040.GA89346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <15204.1183047166@thecus> <200706281621.l5SGLHKR015636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070628180040.GA89346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Phil Pennock wrote:
> Does the output below look reasonable and desirable to people?

The libraries there look they're used by some part of the shell,
but probably not every library is being used by every part that's
linked against it.  For example, if there's a libzsh containing most of
the code, I would expect the main zsh executable to require virtually no
libraries beyond libc.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


To access the latest news from CSR copy this link into a web browser:  http://www.csr.com/email_sig.php

To get further information regarding CSR, please visit our Investor Relations page at http://ir.csr.com/csr/about/overview

References:
- PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Phil Pennock

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author