Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions

X-seq: zsh-workers 23621
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:11:35 -0400
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <16925.1183113761@thecus>
Mail-followup-to: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <15204.1183047166@thecus> <200706281621.l5SGLHKR015636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16925.1183113761@thecus>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> And while I agree that rewriting the build system for this issue would
> be excessive, it is closely related to the issue of modules having extra
> dependencies.  Didn't Clint put in some hack so that only the cap module
> depends on libcap.so.

cap and pcre.  It's ugly and fragile and probably unportable, so I never
committed it, but it's used to build the Debian package.

> As pointed out by Danek, using -z ignore for compiler's that support it
> could be an easy fix. At the very least, Debian etc packages could do
> this (Hello Clint). In some cases Sun's -z lazyload would also
> be useful (e.g. iconv). 

Get that feature into GNU binutils and we have a deal.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430989

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

References:
- PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author