Re: Zsh migrated to Symbian OS - Contributing back details.

X-seq: zsh-workers 25295

From: "Karthik B" <karthikeyan.balu@xxxxxxxxx>

To: "Peter Stephenson" <pws@xxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: Zsh migrated to Symbian OS - Contributing back details.

Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:41:31 +0530

Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx, Karthikeyan.Balu@xxxxxxxxxxx

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=1etOxPov8sAyW6swrSwsAjBQxwhDbeoejPbzrZiFzx8=; b=W1dMVA3xnNcvKRsuRdpYUYq64pF9sJWaL6/EknYb9jfmcLusUepjIhExJcx5MpaIIN LDsh4TY0Luhud1WbpArA2Z5X9S2OXhZqwLDawjVCa/9MalqX/JPZYK2qSP5kuU/dfsDI ASNxe6jYrdGPfvfTKMJP343WQkMdfLqU51kbY=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ohvATh9/4IdshwthKb4gwOAI9/5nCKhf/UQH9bB1Jhee1HqtSu3ecHqxc2X4jlnlNE 2lMGDcbu6b6Jw1igdC59EESYRZxUoEdQmIj6kIG3fadcXa+HEWPIogAGYmQQV6OiNTFA QsbKnlWfdTMnE8WLjbmaAZlaEkyhed+t6+M2g=

In-reply-to: <20080717110415.154ce998@news01>

Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

References: <20080429111157.67641fc2@news01> <OFB0E8C42B.753CA292-ON65257488.001CAD31-65257488.001D8BBB@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dfe1dff40807160527j4e15f3ccg7d6e0cdae84e2587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dfe1dff40807162217w678f32eeh9b13ba2efd903fa8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080717101218.144144ac@news01> <dfe1dff40807170254tce8b587x393e23b76880ebf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080717110415.154ce998@news01>

We shall start exploring this integration from our side.

Which is the latest development branch that you would suggest to base our integration.?, and other tips that you would like to give us.

Karthik.

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:24:03 +0530

"Karthik B" <karthikeyan.balu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> After integration, we must make sure that the existing behaviors on Linux is
> not broken, so is there any test suite (sort of) to confirm this.?

Yes, it's not completely comprehensive but it's quite good at testing low
level stuff. (The major weakness is interactive features; we need a
pty-based test harness for that.) After building the shell, run "make
test" in the Test subdirectory. Either all tests should pass, or you
should see a plausible message why a test wasn't executed or actually
failed on a given platform.

--

Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070

Reverse Date

Date

Thread

Author