Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: non-interactive set -m
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27118
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: non-interactive set -m
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:40:32 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20090709205608.52875b5f@pws-pc>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <loom.20090707T205334-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200907080858.n688wXfc030608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20090708T124251-758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200907081349.n68DneSv001850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20090709T170937-567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090709205608.52875b5f@pws-pc>
On Jul 9, 8:56pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} It seems entirely reasonable not to try to take over the terminal if
} you're in a shell that didn't think it was controlling the terminal in
} the first place. I'm not the job control expert, but since this doesn't
} affect the usual case anyway I've committed it.
I don't know if I qualify as the expert, either, but IMO this should
be OK.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author