Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?

X-seq: zsh-workers 29296
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 12:01:54 +0200
Cc: zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7SrejTlVBp+BduQOXOSBA0H9r5oHq3RzhoR0bh0e0lU=; b=kx/YkxHCG6lkoueIssJ9asgCutapuoSaDGQ/rJ35vP/r9fPvqsm8YnkgzpQBfwS1w+ 87pKvFcE7mx3pJDP6eGKtyHmQkEZ3aSzBrpgsF9NzyT7l+q5GHbN/0Ed8A9CfRYk/KyF z3YjMTtNP22+SxHbNAeu0gr7zHC36ekbnt7uQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OjcyxUHBSYIv4exPeo2fQEpgGFAzEdkjt7IuF+CEMCn2cY8FdiwpjC7NDFOKzbSZDV v4Bnj6Ez/yEx5R5ML01j8W364RJ5n2lNnNH22WLlGsLwY/9rVhE3GFn9XsSHcufnEBu+ QxV4QhdYXh4Zi1FDyDiO+DEuwwo7g/7wMNcPo=
In-reply-to: <BANLkTimts9FbKv9Et4kNfS544zfXCd-Gdw@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <BANLkTikqnR3pJk8FzRT6Qo9J+wTMGSnycQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110513191710.657d2f61@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <BANLkTi=KyDfiM1YqXR0q1w-PxiAeQ0thdQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110513195324.6ab90eb2@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <BANLkTi=7vnGkz2uPTyd3Br019SuxV5_Q2Q@mail.gmail.com> <110513225805.ZM13712@torch.brasslantern.com> <BANLkTi=c-dxpE5Dtm-SAEFE8YJRaguc+Tw@mail.gmail.com> <110514183909.ZM15134@torch.brasslantern.com> <BANLkTimts9FbKv9Et4kNfS544zfXCd-Gdw@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 May 2011 11:48, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is the squeeze-slashes setting
> needed at all though? It seems like changing it or path-completion has
> exactly the same effect; does enabling squeeze-slashes change some
> behaviour that disabling path-completion does not change?

Ignore this, I'm not completely awake yet :)

-- 
Mikael Magnusson

References:
- squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
  - From: Mikael Magnusson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author