Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache

X-seq: zsh-workers 35325
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:13:26 +0100
In-reply-to: <150528151844.ZM11659@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
References: <54D78CA8.7010802@thequod.de> <150208122744.ZM5447@torch.brasslantern.com> <13334.1432764608@thecus.kiddle.eu> <150528151844.ZM11659@torch.brasslantern.com>

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:18:44 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So ... this applies on top of ae7dcab5ed1882b6115c9fe3ab7894a8b6a7e9eb but
> not with 899613f5351642c8257401054fef5f25725af172.
> 
> Are we sticking with the reverted version for release, or applying 35310
> atop 34476?

If that fixes the problem, applying them both would be fine.

pws

References:
- Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
  - From: Daniel Hahler
- Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author